quarta-feira, 19 de março de 2014

Book Review: Eleanor & Park by Rainbow Rowell



I read this book for the 2014 Book Genre Challenge.

I'm going to say it right away: I did not like this book. While I didn't hate it to pieces to warrant a 1 star rating, I thought it was boring, racist, and it made me really uncomfortable. I did not like the characters nor the story and, which is worse, I couldn't believe the characters nor the story. To me, the characters felt flat and the story unrealistic.
This review will be me commenting the thoughts that I had while reading the book. If you loved this book and you don't want to read a negative opinion about it, I suggest you stop this review now. I don't have many nice things to say about it. Also, this review may contain spoilers and it does contain quotes from the book. 
  • A+ for Park in the beginning. New girl and all he can think is that she looks like a scarecrow. For one who is afraid the other kids will pick on him, he can be extremely mean;
  • 'Especially not for someone like this'. A+ again, Park. That's the spirit!
  • 'the Asian kid'. Not 'the guy' or whatever. 'The Asian kid'. And it goes on for the entire duration of the book. While I give Rowell my congratulations for trying to portray the racism and prejudice that Asian citizens of the US had to endure during that time (and sadly still have to endure now), there is no need to remind us at every page that his Asian by saying 'Asian kid' or 'Asian boy'. And the worse is that this is how Eleanor describes him on her head: the Asian boy;
  • I didn't like how we know close to nothing about Park's mom. Park doesn't know much about his mom or her culture!
  • Now, this is a peeve of mine, but I hate that every foreigner character in books speaks the same way. They can live in a country for ages, but they don't know the most basic grammar rules of the English language. I'm not talking about accents, there's nothing wrong with those. There is nothing wrong with making mistakes as well, but you don't need to make one mistake after the other only because you are not a native speaker! Your foreign characters don't need to be written like that, there will be other things to define them, like their culture! Which Rowell completely forgot;
  • Oh, the bullshit!
  • 'Asia is out-of-control huge'. Yup, nice way to describe it;
  • 'Whatever perversion coused him to like her'. Yes, that totally makes me buy the whole 'they're completely in love' thing;
  • I liked how Eleanor wanted to tell him 'that he was prettier than any girl' (yes, that was sarcasm). Why? Because he's Asian, of course!
  • And, if you had forgotten Park was Asian, his almond flavored eyes would remind you of that, and the way they almost desappeared when he smiled, or his skin, or his ninja magic, or... I'll just stop here. Eleanor almost objectifies Park and the fact that he is Asian, it was something that really bothered me when I was reading;
  • This next bit made me really, really, really angry for a number of reasons. It was the Dainty China people and how Park's mother reminded Eleanor of one. And also how Park's father 'sneaked her [Park's mom] out of Korea in his pocket'. Seriously, I screamed with the book during this bit. I couldn't believe that! I guess it could be an attempt from Rowell of showing the way Asian people are stereotypied ands seen as the 'other', the 'different', thus something that needed to be romanticized. But then I saw it wasn't. Eleanor stopped looking at Mindy as a person and started seeing her as something that could be smuggled out of a country. And then I read Rowell's reasons as to why Park is Korean and I saw this: 
                   'So … in Eleanor & Park, Park’s dad gets sent to Korea because his brother has died in combat                                    in Vietnam. He meets his soulmate there. And he brings her home.'

       
         No, ok. No. It wasn't home for her. No, she is not an object to be 'sneaked out of Korea'. She is  a            person. One who left her cultural identity, family, and language back to go home with the man she                 loved. But a woman with a solid cultural background that is hardly ever mentioned, if ever mentioned at         all, who only seems to be there to make Park half Koren so he can whine about it;
  • Then Eleanor starts wondering where the slim girls keep their organs... 
  • Park goes 'weird white girls are my only option' and 'it was nice to have the most popular girl in the neighborhood offering herself to him every now and then.' And people wonder why I don't like him;
  • Oh, he also goes 'He'd thought that he was over caring what people thought about him. He'd thought that loving Eleanor proved that'. And people wonder why I don't think they were in love...
  • Eleanor says Park looked as dangerous as Ming the Merciless;
  • 'Nobody thinks Asian guys are hot' and 'Asian girls are different. White guys think they're exotic' and 'Everything that makes Asian girls seem exotic make Asian guys seem like girls' made me want to throw the book against the wall (I only didn't because I was reading the book on my Kobo). I could spend a long time talking about fetishzation of Asian women (and all other 'different' women) and how dangerous it is to put something like this lightly on a book, but I guess you can see that for yourself;
  • The ending felt bland. I didn't like how the writings on her book were only solved in the end and how absolutely nothing was done about it, how her siblings would remain in the care of a abusive alcoholic guy, and how Park's father let him drive Eleanor alone at 2am.
I didn't like the book, but I also didn't hate it to pieces (because there were some interesting aspects - such as the huge difference between their families and its influence on their relationship -, even though they were underused and underdeveloped in my opinion). So my rating is:

2 out of 5 stars.


segunda-feira, 10 de março de 2014

Book Review: Anna and the French Kiss by Stephanie Perkins




'Anna and the French Kiss'... This was my second attempt at reading this book. I couldn't focus on it, nor get interested in it, during the first attempt. Now, as I joined Booktown Bookclub, I thought I'd give it another go. Sadly, it didn't get any better for me. I still didn't like it and couldn't get into it. 

Things I liked:
  • I loved the descriptions of the places! One thing the book did great in my opinion was to make me feel as if I were in Paris. It was great. I loved the places and how Anna saw them. It was lively and believable. The descriptions made me feel as if the story was actually happening and that I were watching it unfold;
  • I also liked the description of the characters. I felt like Perkins wanted to give as much detail about the characters as possible, but also did not want to overdo it. And she didn't. I really enjoyed the way the characters were described and I liked she left some details to our imagination;
  •  I liked the culture shock Anna experienced. Not only when she went to Paris, but when she went back home as well. 
Things I didn't like:
  • Actually, the whole storyline. I'm not really a fan of romance books, but if the story and the characters are interesting, I have nothing against them. The thing is, I didn't find neither the story nor the characters interesting;
  • I did not like Anna in the slightest, especially the whole 'she's not like the other girls' thing. She is annoying, always judging other people, she got angry with her friend for 'stealing' her 'boyfriend' and then she did the same thing. I did not like the character at all;
  • Of course St. Clair had to be the hottest, most well loved boy in school. Why not?
  • Ellie. I have nothing against Ellie. She was hardly ever present, only mentioned. She  turned her back on her friends, went away, and never got in touch again. This, of course, was only there so Anna could appear to be a nice girl and we would be hooting for her and St. Clair to be together;
  • The whole cheating thing. I absolutely abhor cheating. It doesn't matter if they're the main characters and we wan them to be togehter. I'd like St. Clair to be braver and act on his feeling. He should have broken up way sooner than that. Also, he was cheating on his girlfriend (yes, cheating: he was flirting and sleeping with Anna, and he kissed Anna when he was still with Ellie), I'm not sure if I'd trust him;
  • The whole high school drama. This was the point when I started rolling my eyes;
  • The background characters that are only there to make Anna company or something and to say how great St. Clair was;
  • The mushy part (but that is me, I don't like it).
Overall, I found the idea to be interesting, the descriptions are great, but the book, in my opinion, didn't meet my expectations.

Rating: 2 out of 5 stars








quinta-feira, 6 de março de 2014

Book Review: The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie




This book is part of my reading for the 2014 Book Genre Challenge.

I chose to read this book for the Contemporary challenge first because I an a fan of Sherman Alexie's work and second because this seemed to be a very nice read!

  • The overall story. I really enjoyed to know Junior and his life and difficulties and how he overcame some of his problems;
  • How the cartoons complemented the story and, sometimes, even showed us what happened in the story instead of the narrator's voice;
  • First person is always good for this kind of book, it helps us to see what the character is feeling in his own words and perspective. Junior's perspective is unique and funny and helps us understand better the world we live in;
  • As much as I liked the way Junior told the story, I admit it took me some time to get used to it. However, when I did, I really enjoyed the whole story. 

Rating: 4 stars out of 5


sábado, 1 de março de 2014

February Wrap Up



This month I read the total of 8 books! They are:

  • Across the Universe by Beth Revis. I read this book for the 2014 Book Genre Challenge. I liked the story and the characters. I just had some issues with how some things in the book were dealt (or, in this case, not dealt) with . You can find my review here
  • The Maze Runner by James Dashner.  I also read this book for the 2014 Book Genre Challenge. I didn't enjoy this book so much, I think some aspects of it were underused and I would like to have had the chance to understand the mystery as it unravelled, not have the answers thrown at me in the end. You can find my review for it here
  • The Vile Village by Lemony Snicket. Seventh book in the 'A Series of Unfortunate Events' books written by Daniel Handler under the name Lemony Snicket (read the books and you'll find out why this is so amazing). 
  • The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern.  I am very sad to say that I really didn't enjoy this book. I simply couldn't get into the story and everything felt so flat and boring to me. I have a review here
  • Angels in America, Part Two: Perestroika by Tony Kushner. In a word: amazing! Loved it, really. I totally recommed this play. Read it. And the first part as well!
  • Insurgent by Veronica Roth. The second book in the Divergent trilogy was also read for the 2014 Book Genre Challenge. In my opinion, it was slightly less interesting than the first one. However, we finally start having some world build! You can read my review here
  • Tiger's Curse by Collen Houck. First book of the Tiger Saga series. I had mixed feelings about this book: on one hand, I liked the adventure and the mythological aspects; on the other hand, I really disliked some aspects of the story and of the characters. You can read my review here.  
  • The Hostile Hospital by Lemony Sicket. Yet another book in the 'A Series of Unfortunate Events' adventures. In this book, the Baudelaire siblings delve further into the mystery of the fire that killed their parents and into the unfortunate events that seem to rule their life at the moment. 
Those were the books I read this month. If you want to see the books I've read so far this year, you can always check out my 2014 reads!

What did you read in February?